Skip to content

United States Department of Labor Withdraws Independent Contractor Rule Under the Fair Labor Standards Act

May 5, 2021

On May 5,  ­­just a few short months after the U.S. Department of Labor issued its final rule to clarify the independent contractor classification under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) – the DOL  issued a statement of the rule’s withdrawal. The withdrawal will be effective May 6. The action follows the DOL’s hint at its disfavor of the new rule in Jan. 2021 when the DOL withdrew two opinion letters containing the new rule’s analysis and application of the factors to specific scenarios.

As discussed in the e-alert issued on Jan. 8, the proposed rule provided a set of standards for determining when an individual would be classified as an independent contractor. The test purported to provide further structure and clarity on independent contractor status under the FLSA. The test consisted of the following two core factors: (1) the nature and degree to which the worker exercises control over the work, and (2) the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss. The final rule also proposed three other factors to be considered in the event these two core factors did not yield a clear determination.

Now that the rule has been withdrawn, employers must utilize the seven-factor economic realities test that was used previously. These factors are outlined in the Wage and Hour Division’s Fact Sheet #13 from July 2008, and are as follows:

  1. The extent to which the services rendered are an integral part of the principal’s business.
  2. The permanency of the relationship.
  3. The amount of the alleged contractor’s investment in facilities and equipment.
  4. The nature and degree of control by the principal.
  5. The alleged contractor’s opportunities for profit and loss.
  6. The amount of initiative, judgment, or foresight in open market competition with others required for the success of the claimed independent contractor.
  7. The degree of independent business organization and operation.

Unlike the test explained in the January rule, the economic realities test does not weigh any single factor or pair of factors more heavily than another. Additionally, this list is non-exhaustive, providing only a list of factors the U.S. Supreme Court has deemed significant to the analysis and thereby leaving courts and employers to consider other scenario-specific facts in determining independent contractor versus employee status. As such, the economic realities test does carry some uncertainty, so employers will have to move forward cautiously as they continue to examine individuals through the lens of the economic realities test.

The DOL states in a News Release that its goal in withdrawing the rule is to preserve employee protections under the FLSA, including those relating to overtime and minimum wage. Because the final rule had not yet taken effect at the time of its withdrawal, this may not be a drastic change for most employers.

If you have any questions about the contents of this article, please contact Carolyn Horton at chorton@clarkhill.com or your Clark Hill attorney.

This publication is intended for general education and informational purposes only, and should not be regarded as either legal advice or a legal opinion. You should not act upon or use this publication or any of its contents for any specific situation. Recipients are cautioned to obtain legal advice from their legal counsel with respect to any decision or course of action contemplated in a specific situation. Clark Hill PLC and its attorneys provide legal advice only after establishing an attorney-client relationship through a written attorney-client engagement agreement. This publication does not establish an attorney-client relationship with any recipient.

Subscribe For The Latest

Subscribe

Related

Event

Webinar: Stay Ahead in Privacy and Data Breach Litigation

Join us for an essential update on the dynamic landscape of privacy and data breach litigation. This session will explore the latest trends and emerging challenges, including developments in Pixel litigation, BIPA, GIPA, CIPA, VPPA, standing issues, and critical defense strategies. We’ll analyze recent cases, pivotal rulings, and newly filed lawsuits while providing strategic guidance for litigation and settlement. Gain actionable insights to help you confidently navigate this complex and evolving legal environment confidently.

Don’t miss this opportunity to stay informed and prepared in the evolving field of privacy and data breach litigation.

Explore more
Event

Webinar- Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA): A Cross-Border Discussion on Incident Response

Join us for an in-depth discussion on how the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), effective January 17, 2025, will transform digital and operational resilience requirements in the financial sector. This session will focus on the specific obligations related to incident response and explore the adjustments businesses should make to their existing programs to achieve compliance.

Explore more
Event

Webinar: AI Year in Review: From State AI Laws and Automated Decision-Making Regulations to the Rise of AI Liability

2024 has been a pivotal year for artificial intelligence, marked by the passage of state AI legislation, the introduction of privacy regulations targeting automated decision-making and profiling, and an uptick in lawsuits challenging businesses’ use of AI tools. This webinar will provide a comprehensive review of the evolving AI landscape, summarizing key enacted laws, exploring emerging legal challenges, and offering actionable strategies for businesses deploying AI technologies.

Explore more