Skip to content

Mislabeling Claims Under California Law

October 31, 2022

In 1970, California enacted the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), creating what remains the most comprehensive state consumer protection statute in the country. Under the CLRA, consumers who bought goods or services that were sold through “unfair methods of competition” and “unfair or deceptive acts” may bring an individual or class action lawsuit seeking damages or injunctive relief.  Accompanied by similar consumer protection statutes such as California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and False Advertising Law (FAL), the CLRA has created a complex minefield of legal pitfalls for companies conducting business in the state. In recent years, litigation under the CLRA and other California consumer protection laws has increased substantially, encouraged by the success of specialized consumer protection law firms, large class action settlements, and favorable judicial outcomes.

Companies with food and beverage products are particularly vulnerable to consumer lawsuits that allege the use of “false or misleading” or otherwise deficient labeling under California law. California courts are increasingly a hotbed for these types of mislabeling claims. Barilla, a multinational Italian food company and the world’s largest producer of pasta, is the most recent company under fire. They were recently sued in a putative class action under the CLRA, UCL, and FAL, with plaintiffs taking issue with the company’s slogan, printed on every box: “Italy’s #1 Brand of Pasta.” Other mainstream food brands such as Nestlé, Kodiak Cakes pancake batter, and Celsius energy drinks have also fallen victim to mislabeling claims.

The main problem facing the food and beverage industry is a compliance nightmare of confusing regulations. Under California’s Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law (Sherman Law), which regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of food, the state adopted all of the FDA’s food-labeling rules. Applicable regulations include the FDA’s complex requirements for representing sugar, protein, or nutrient content on a label. These rules are ill-defined and subject to inconsistent interpretation. As a result, companies that sell food products in California must comply with hundreds of vague and complicated federal regulations to the “T,” or potentially face substantial losses in consumer class actions.

For more information on the Clark Hill retail and hospitality team, please click here.

For more information on the Clark Hill food and beverage team, please click here.

If you have an interest in being added to any of the Clark Hill mailing lists, please click here.

The views and opinions expressed in the article represent the view of the author and not necessarily the official view of Clark Hill PLC. Nothing in this article constitutes professional legal advice nor is it intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice.

Subscribe For The Latest

Subscribe

Related

Event

Webinar: Stay Ahead in Privacy and Data Breach Litigation

Join us for an essential update on the dynamic landscape of privacy and data breach litigation. This session will explore the latest trends and emerging challenges, including developments in Pixel litigation, BIPA, GIPA, CIPA, VPPA, standing issues, and critical defense strategies. We’ll analyze recent cases, pivotal rulings, and newly filed lawsuits while providing strategic guidance for litigation and settlement. Gain actionable insights to help you confidently navigate this complex and evolving legal environment confidently.

Don’t miss this opportunity to stay informed and prepared in the evolving field of privacy and data breach litigation.

Explore more
Event

Webinar- Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA): A Cross-Border Discussion on Incident Response

Join us for an in-depth discussion on how the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), effective January 17, 2025, will transform digital and operational resilience requirements in the financial sector. This session will focus on the specific obligations related to incident response and explore the adjustments businesses should make to their existing programs to achieve compliance.

Explore more
Event

Webinar: AI Year in Review: From State AI Laws and Automated Decision-Making Regulations to the Rise of AI Liability

2024 has been a pivotal year for artificial intelligence, marked by the passage of state AI legislation, the introduction of privacy regulations targeting automated decision-making and profiling, and an uptick in lawsuits challenging businesses’ use of AI tools. This webinar will provide a comprehensive review of the evolving AI landscape, summarizing key enacted laws, exploring emerging legal challenges, and offering actionable strategies for businesses deploying AI technologies.

Explore more