CTA Injunction Lifted and Additional Reporting Time Provided
Authors
Michael P. Croghan , Joseph R. Struble
On Dec. 23, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals lifted the preliminary injunction in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland (E.D. Tex.). The Court lifted the injunction pending appeal on the merits, leaving open the possibility that the injunction could be reinstated or vacated after a more fulsome appellate review. For now, however, reporting requirements are back in effect. Shortly after the ruling, FinCEN issued a clarifying press release extending the deadline for entities to file their CTA BOI reports:
- Reporting companies that were created or registered prior to Jan. 1, 2024, have until Jan. 13, 2025, to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN. (These companies would otherwise have been required to report by January 1, 2025.)
- Reporting companies created or registered in the United States on or after Sept. 4, 2024, that had a filing deadline between Dec. 3, 2024, and Dec.23, 2024, have until Jan. 13, 2025, to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN.
- Reporting companies created or registered in the United States on or after Dec. 3, 2024, and on or before Dec. 23, 2024, have an additional 21 days from their original filing deadline to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN.
The full details of the additional reporting time are available on the FinCEN BOI homepage at https://www.fincen.gov/boi. The Fifth Circuit’s ruling means that, for the time being, all beneficial ownership reporting requirements are now back in effect with deadline extensions.
Clark Hill’s CTA Task Force is monitoring updates to the CTA and is available to counsel clients on reporting and compliance requirements.
This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.